NOTE: While these data were reported the past epidemiological week, they may not be from that week. See earlier post about possible reporting lag.
Graph No. 1 shows that 176 new laboratory confirmed cases of ZVD were reported this week. The total sits at 8,826 or 10% (the highest proportion reported to date-steady for the past 6 reporting weeks) of all clinically suspected Zika virus (ZIKV) detections.
As of this report, 21 (+3 from last EW) live births have been diagnosed with congenital ZIKV syndrome (CZVS; microcephaly/central nervous system disorder), confirmed as being ZIKV positive. That represents 0.36% of all confirmed ZIKV positive mothers-the 4th EW in which this proportion has risen.
Some back of napkin calculations looking at these numbers suggest that there are 3-4 deliveries for every 1,000 ZIKV-positive pregnant women that result in a ZIKV infected baby with microcephaly. This assumes each neonate has been tested for ZIKV as [6] suggests. This figure has no clear understanding of the number of aborted or miscarried foetuses that are also occurring from ZIKV-positive pregnant women. Abortions and miscarriages will need a local baseline to understand the scope of this component of the impact of ZIKV infection.
160 other microcephaly diagnoses (up from 112 last week and the highest value to date) are now under investigation - this value has also been rising very quickly and suggests suspicious CZVS cases in Colombia are accruing faster than the pace of complete investigation can keep up with.
It now seems very likely that we can expect those bars to keep rising steeply in the coming weeks. The line is well and truly crossed.
Graph No. 4 below focuses on just the ZIKV-positive cases and those that remain under investigation, highlighting how the investigatory total has changed each week and been trending upwards since Epidemiological Week No. 14.
It has now been 275 days, or 9 months 1 day, since ZIKV was first confirmed in Colombia on 16th October 2015.[2] Colombia is currently carrying the next biggest load of ZVD cases, after Brazil.[3] Keep in mind that when talking about microcephaly - we have to think back in time to what insult or infection might have occurred in the first or second trimester (probably-still not definitive). The counts of virus occurring this week will have zero impact on what happened back then. Also keep in mind that Colombia may be reporting things differently from Brazil.[5,7]
Brazil first reported positive (but unconfirmed) laboratory tests for Zika virus disease on 29th April 2015. Brazil then started to report a rise in foetal anomalies (an initial 141), in the form of microcephaly on 30th October 2015. This was 184 days - or about 6 months later.[4]
References...
- http://www.ins.gov.co/boletin-epidemiologico/Boletn%20Epidemiolgico/2016%20Bolet%C3%ADn%20epidemiol%C3%B3gico%20semana%2027.pdf
- http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-171082/en/
- http://www.nature.com/news/first-zika-linked-birth-defects-detected-in-colombia-1.19502
- http://who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-171082/en/
- http://virologydownunder.blogspot.com.au/2016/06/the-elephant-squeaked.html
- Zika Virus Disease in Colombia — Preliminary Report
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1604037#t=article - https://www.statnews.com/2016/06/22/zika-abortion-latin-america/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.